One caveat is that new forester fitted with standard eyesight will be without solar film on front windscreen (other windows yes) which owners have to fit at their "risk" like current xv and impreza. all purely speculation at this juncture and up to individual if prudent and not willing to risk another 15k at the least I think to buy now or wait for new platform. Were thinking about a retirement car to replace my wifes Honda CRV, which has like 110000. 30k difference for the extra trunk space and rear legroom, it will surely sway buyers to the Fozzie over the XV. That 2.5L NA engine is adequate enough to put the Foresters performance comparable to other CUVs with a 2.5L or 2.4L NA engine (same as the CX5 AWD, RAV4 AWD, CRV AWD). It does seems from usa options that even rear aircon is an option there and not standard but it is up to MI to define what is standard here. 20 posts 16 authorsX (whatever that means), 21000, 20000 miles. However, in North America and Europe, their base Forester SJs are powered by a 2.5L NA engine (same as the Legacy) unlike here where we have the lower output FB20.
The rest is up to MI mgt how to price and devised the options but at even 15-20k more or say 115k, I am not aware of any equitable medium sized SUV with standard AWD and most complete safety platform of eyesight system. Wonder if it's a good deal to buy the existing stock now or wait for the new model.Hi Dach,ĬOE looks to be stable for next few months which is good to remove this single key factor.
0 kommentar(er)
